Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bot clerking, archiving 3 threads, 13 pending requests remain.
Requesting protection for Hikaru Utada
Line 74: Line 74:


'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent addition of [[WP:INTREF|unsourced or poorly sourced content]] – various IP editors trying to add Ukraine to the list of current operators of this weapon, when it reportedly only captured the vehicle. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 01:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent addition of [[WP:INTREF|unsourced or poorly sourced content]] – various IP editors trying to add Ukraine to the list of current operators of this weapon, when it reportedly only captured the vehicle. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 01:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

=== [[Hikaru Utada]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Hikaru Utada}}
'''Reason:''' '''Indefinite semi-protection''' Common target for enbies to force exclusive use of they/them into a she/they enby, and I am sick of seeing it having to constantly be reverted and would like to see the most effective preventative measure taken. [[User:Unnamed anon|Unnamed anon]] ([[User talk:Unnamed anon|talk]]) 03:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:17, 2 March 2022

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and a new editor (presumably the same individual) have engaged in repeatedly adding to the article unsupported information both here and at Liverpool F.C.–Manchester City F.C. rivalry. Explanations to the changes made have been made, and the changes have been reverted by multiple users in response. Koncorde (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a case of unilateral edit warring. Since no warning had been issued, I just did so. If it starts up again, report this user to WP:ANEW instead. Jayron32 16:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

digital art

Reason: vandalism (NPOV and biased wording) from User talk:JaggedHamster - JohnnyCoal (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Looks like they've resolved their content dispute. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Home Alone 3

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's unprotection will be a joke.[Joke] (Because it's being unprotected on April 1) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: We at the Wikipedia do not have a sense of humor we're aware of. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putin (surname)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 17:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: At least they did not redirect it to a feminine product --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vyera Pharmaceuticals

Reason: Article has been the target of a Vyera IP and apparent newly-registered employees over the past week. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Modu Chanyu

Reason: High level of IP vandalisms, the latest by IP user 194.146.157.91, possibly the same as or belonging to the same group of vandals tendentiously adding their preferred anachronistic modern Turkish Metehan in article's opening paragraph Erminwin (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry

Reason: Edit war by Cypriot IP address 114.124.146.60 (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alley of Angels

Reason: IP's violating NPOV and other disruptions in the past few days. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Book of Boba Fett

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Mario film

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP cast hoaxing, etc. wizzito | say hello! 00:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kyiv (2022)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruptive edits as some autoconfirmed users are trying to shove in their viewpoints on various points. I think WP:ARBEE applies, no? Curbon7 (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyiv offensive (2022)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. WP:ARBEE, same as above Curbon7 (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I totally love edits that not only include incorrect information, but also remove the source for that incorrect information. [1] Curbon7 (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maghreb

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been the target of nationalists for quite some time. Mostly SPA and passing IPs who are intent on censoring the mention of either RASD (a founding member of the AU) or Western Sahara. If you look at the article's history, you'll understand what I mean. The last one edit warred over the removal and has been reported to AN3, but unless the article is protected, the disruption will continue until they get what they want (one way or the other). M.Bitton (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TOS-1

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – various IP editors trying to add Ukraine to the list of current operators of this weapon, when it reportedly only captured the vehicle. – robertsky (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hikaru Utada

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection Common target for enbies to force exclusive use of they/them into a she/they enby, and I am sick of seeing it having to constantly be reverted and would like to see the most effective preventative measure taken. Unnamed anon (talk) 03:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]