Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Designating Sri Lanka as a contentious topic: removing - dispatched by motion
Tag: Replaced
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>

== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Cossde|Cossde]] ([[User talk:Cossde|talk]]) '''at''' 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

=== Proposed parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Cossde}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Petextrodon}}
*{{userlinks|Tame Rhino}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[diff of notification Petextrodon]
*[diff of notification Tame Rhino]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
* https://cuddlysnowman.com/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#Request_for_multiple_citations
* https://cuddlysnowman.com/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#NESOHR
* https://cuddlysnowman.com/wiki/Talk:List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_Sri_Lankan_government_forces#Adding_single_sourced_content

=== Statement by Cossde ===
This page as seen weeks of [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] and possible [[WP:NAT]] editing, with controversial content been added with single sources that are most cases primary sources that have clear conflict of intrests and even been labled "pro-rebal". Some other sources with [[WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS]], that makes the content appear [[WP:OR]]. Request for more citations per [[WP:EXCEPTIONAL]] and [[WP:CHALLENGE]] have been refused. Hence I am requesting arbitration to settle this matter by establishing the quality, type and style of citations needed for this artcile. [[User:Cossde|Cossde]] ([[User talk:Cossde|talk]]) 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
=== Statement by Petextrodon ===

=== Statement by Tame Rhino ===
=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
{{anchor|1=Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
*

Revision as of 05:19, 29 April 2024

Requests for arbitration

Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute

Initiated by Cossde (talk) at 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
  • [diff of notification Petextrodon]
  • [diff of notification Tame Rhino]
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Cossde

This page as seen weeks of WP:BATTLEGROUND and possible WP:NAT editing, with controversial content been added with single sources that are most cases primary sources that have clear conflict of intrests and even been labled "pro-rebal". Some other sources with WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, that makes the content appear WP:OR. Request for more citations per WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:CHALLENGE have been refused. Hence I am requesting arbitration to settle this matter by establishing the quality, type and style of citations needed for this artcile. Cossde (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Petextrodon

Statement by Tame Rhino

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)