Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 May 2024

12 May 2024

27 January 2024

18 October 2023

16 October 2023

14 October 2023

13 October 2023

12 October 2023

4 July 2023

1 March 2023

15 February 2023

20 October 2022

24 August 2022

23 August 2022

31 May 2022

  • curprev 11:1711:17, 31 May 2022Uanfala talk contribs 6,707 bytes −20 →‎top: the description should make it clear why the hatnote is listed here (the common factor is "blue", not "link colour"); no need to mention Wikipedia: obviously all the guidelines are about it undo

29 May 2022

20 May 2022

18 May 2022

13 April 2022

7 April 2022

31 March 2022

8 March 2022

6 January 2022

18 December 2021

11 December 2021

25 November 2021

28 September 2021

5 June 2021

21 May 2021

6 January 2021

12 November 2020

18 August 2020

6 July 2020

25 June 2020

5 May 2020

17 October 2019

25 August 2019

18 August 2019

3 June 2019

  • curprev 06:0406:04, 3 June 2019Snow Rise talk contribs 6,180 bytes −1 And correction of dummy edit. undo
  • curprev 06:0306:03, 3 June 2019Snow Rise talk contribs 6,181 bytes +1 →‎top: Dummy edit in order to introduce the following correction into the edit summary history: in the last edit, I said that the page and been re-labelled inappropriately to an essay. I meant to say rather that it had been re-labelled from WP:essay status to WP:infopage status without appropriate community process, vetting, and validation, and thus I've reverted it back--discussion with the party who made this change unilaterally being pointless in that they were sitebanned. undo
  • curprev 06:0006:00, 3 June 2019Snow Rise talk contribsm 6,180 bytes −2 Minor copy edits. undo
  • curprev 05:5805:58, 3 June 2019Snow Rise talk contribs 6,182 bytes −3 I just noticed that this page was re-labelled an essay by a user who was ultimately sitebanned by the community for disruptive behaviour,with absolutely no explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page for why it should be so upgraded.The page remains very much an idiosyncratic essay-like statement of opinion as to how to approach WP:V + I do not feel it has gone through a proper community WP:PROMOTE process to validate that it is a straight summary of policy.Reverting accordingly. undo

14 April 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)