Talk:Ashaari Mohammad

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wimp vs. whim[edit]

Why this member __earth insulted me WIMP (WIMP - dictionary: A person who is regarded as weak or ineffectual)? I was only editing the article because I thought it was not good enough and I want to improve it but he __earth came insulting me WIMP! What kind of Wikipedian he is, does he know manner? KCKaySee 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I know my article is not good enough but why insult me? I will improve it slowly. KCKaySee 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can reassure you here - he didn't mean to insult you. He's just mistyped on his keyboard! 'Wimp' is technically an insult, but he didn't mean to say it. Don't worry.Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 03:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect he mistyped at meant to say "whim" docboat 03:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I apologize. __earth ^(Talk) 04:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and misrepresentation[edit]

This page is high NPOV and seemingly used to advance a contentious position earlier discussed at Talk:Malaysia. While the person himself may be notable within Malaysia, he is known for his modified Islamic belief, not for Arabization. __earth ^(Talk) 04:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched the 'sources' quoted from this article. All except one advocates on Ashaari being an extremist Islamist leader who have its narrow interpretation of Islam. Nothing about Arabisation as mentioned. One source, however, is from the mahaguru blog, denoting this blogger's opinion about the 'creeping' of Arab culture into Malay. Tell me whether the argument is strong enough in this sense. And it is what Earth said, Ashaari was condemned because of the sectarian ideology of Islam. --Zack2007 05:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contentious material removed[edit]

I have removed this material from the main space: Ashaari Mohammad procures Malaysian women as sex slaves and trains suicide commandos in the jungle [1].

It was the opinion of Mahathir that the women were sex slaves, based on his interpretation of Shari'a law - but Mahathir was not known for his infallible accuracy, and was known to demonise his opponents. This statement cannot stand, it does not meet guidelines for biographies of living persons. docboat 08:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ashaari Mohammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]